Legal Opinion

United States v. Long

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 20, 1895No. 721PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Benedict Long was indicted under “Rev. St. § 5480, for using tlie United States postal establishment as a means to defraud. Defendant demurred to the indictment.

1Opinion of the Court

WELLBORN, District Judge.

There are three counts in the indictment, but, so far as concerns the demurrer, they are alike, and may be considered together. The objections urged to the indictment are that the averment as to the devising of the fraudulent scheme alleged against the defendant is by way of recital, not direct statement, and that there is no charge whatever, unless it be by implication or inference, that the defendant intended, as a part of such scheme, to effect the same by opening correspondence through the postal establishment of the United States. The averment in question is as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weeber v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1894
  2. United States v. WoottenDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1887
  3. United States v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  2. Erbaugh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  3. Lehman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
  4. Ewing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
  5. United States v. RyanDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API