Ewing v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error was convicted of a violation of the provisions of section 5480 of the Revised Statutes, as amended March 2, 1889 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3696]. The indictment alleged that on December 31, 1900, the plaintiff in error and one George B. Chaney devised a scheme to defraud certain persons named, “which said scheme to defraud was to be effected by opening correspondence and communication with such persons and by distributing advertisements, circulars, prospectuses and letters by means of the post-office establishment of the United States and by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Stokes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Hume v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1902
- O'Hara v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Horn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Hass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Erbaugh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913