Legal Opinion
Carlson v. BNSF Railway Company
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 4, 2022No. 0:19-cv-01232Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Jason Carlson, Case No. 19-cv-1232 (WMW/HB) Plaintiff, ORDER v. BNSF Railway Company, Defendant. In this action arising from alleged whistleblower retaliation and workplace injuries, Defendant BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) moves for summary judgment as to each of Plaintiff Jason Carlson’s three claims to relief. (Dkt. 151.) In addition, BNSF moves to exclude the opinions and testimony of Carlson’s engineering expert and to bifurcate Carlson’s claims for trial. (Dkts. 134, 145.) For the reasons addressed below, BNSF’s motion for summary judgment…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.