Legal Opinion

United States v. Ten Erotic Paintings

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 2, 1970No. 14566_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

432 F.2d 420

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,

v.

TEN EROTIC PAINTINGS Identified as George Brosz (Sic), Melle, Water Color, Japanese Painting on Silk, Peverelli, Painting on Crepe Paper, Karel Appel, Indian (Sic) Ink Drawing, Indian Painting, Chinese Painting, Hans Bellemen, (Sic) Drawing, Anonymous French Etching, Appellees.

No. 14566.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued June 3, 1970.

Decided October 2, 1970.

Robert G. Mahony, Atty., Department of Justice (Will Wilson, Asst. Atty. Gen., and William S. Sessions, Atty., Department of Justice, on the brief), for appellant.

Michael…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. A Book Named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" v. Attorney General of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Ginzburg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. Ten Erotic PaintingsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1970
  4. United States v. Ten Erotic PaintingsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API