Legal Opinion

Moreland v. Van Buren GMC

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 23, 1999No. CV95-0914(DRH)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HURLEY, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is the motion of Third-Party Defendants United States Merchant Marine Academy (the “Academy”) and Department of Transportation (“DOT”) and Second Third-Party Defendant United States of America (the “United States”) (sometimes hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Government”) to (1) dismiss this action as against them for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(1) and (2) remand the action to the Nassau County Supreme Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). For…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States Ex Rel. SchumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Superior CourtDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
  2. In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (" MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  3. Barnaby v. QuintosDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  4. Gionfriddo v. SalafDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
  5. County of Suffolk v. Amerada Hess Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API