Legal Opinion
Deirmenjian v. Deutsche Bank, A.G.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided December 14, 2007No. CV 06-774 MMM(CWx)Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT
MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.
On January 12, 2006, Varoujan Deirmen-jian and six other plaintiffs commenced this putative class action in Los Angeles Superior Court against Deutsche Bank, A.G., Dresdner Bank, A.G., and certain fictitious defendants (collectively, “defendants” or “German Bank Defendants”). On February 10, 2006, the action was removed to this court. 1
Plaintiffs bring the action on their own behalf, and on behalf of similarly situated individuals and the general public, to recover money and property…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.