Legal Opinion

Conklin v. Shaw

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1919No. 9426PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Logan District Court, Hon. H. P. Burke, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtGarrigues, C. J.

This action was brought by Emma F. Shaw, defendant in error, as plaintiff below, against H. O. Conklin, Emma Russell and G. A. Bergtold, defendants below, plaintiffs in error here, to quiet title to a section of land in Logan County. Judgment was for plaintiff, and defendants bring the case here on error. We will refer to the parties, as in the lower court, as plaintiff and defendants.

October 31, 1905, the Union Pacific Railroad Company, through its land department, entered into a land contract with one Edward Richardson, agreeing, in consideration of $1,588.50, to sell him the land in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Trice v. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  2. Hansbrough v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Davis v. HamlinIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Warren v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  5. Warner v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1863

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Radke v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  2. Geer v. StathopulosSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  3. Sunshine v. M. R. Mansfield Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  4. Sentinel Acceptance Corporation v. ColgateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  5. Van Diest v. TowleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API