Legal Opinion

Kempson v. St. George Kempson

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 9, 1901PublishedCited by 11 opinions

On motion to punish for contempt.

1Opinion of the Court

Pitney, V. C.

The parties are husband and wife, and were married in 1882, and up to January 1st, 1898, had always lived together as man and wife in the State of New Jersey, residing either at Perth Amboy or at Metuchen, both in Middlesex county. The complainant has borne the defendant nine children, the youngest of whom was born in January, 1898.

The husband was engaged in publishing two or three newspapers at Perth Amboy and Metuchen, and also in editing and publishing an insurance journal in the city of New York. He had an office in a building, No. 173 Broadway, on the northwest corner of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. SchopperNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1916

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Usen v. UsenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
  2. Mayer v. MayerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1957
  3. Brown v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  4. Perlman v. PerlmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  5. Warren v. New Jersey Zinc Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API