Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pierce v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided November 20, 2007No. 1098061Published

1DissentElder, J.

I join the majority’s holding in Part II.A. that admission of evidence of appellant Sandra Pierce’s perjury conviction was error. However, I believe the decision in Cole v. Commonwealth, 16 Va.App. 113, 428 S.E.2d 303 (1993), relied upon by the majority in Part II.B. to conclude the error was harmless, compels a contrary result in light of our interpretation of it in Craddock v. Commonwealth, 16 Va.App. 402, 429 S.E.2d 889 (1993). I would reverse the conviction and remand for a new trial, and, thus, I respectfully dissent.

In Virginia, non-constitutional error is harmless “[w]hen it plainly…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lavinder v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  5. Clay v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API