Ross v. Schneider

Suit by Schneider against Thomas Ross for possession of real estate. Answer, the general denial. Trial by the court without a jury.

The court found that the plaintiff was the owner, and entitled to the possession of the land described iu the complaint, and assessed his damages at seventy-five dollars. Motion for a new trial overruled, and judgment on the finding. Ross appeals.

The reasons urged for a new trial are: first, that the finding is contrary to the evidence; second, that the damages assessed are excessive. ' These are the questions presented in this court.

The facts disclosed by the…