Gonzalez v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STEVEN D. MERRYDAY, District Judge.
An error in a syllogism, otherwise a venerable tool of logic, can assume many forms. In some forms, the faulty syllogism offends the reader immediately, even before the reader identifies precisely the flaw in a premise, because the reader instantly recognizes the flaw in the conclusion. For example:(1)Nothing is better than hot coffee on a cold morning.(2) Lukewarm coffee is better than nothing on a cold morning. Therefore:(3) Lukewarm coffee is better than hot coffee on a cold morning.
Why is this syllogism producing an obviously erroneous conclusion?…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Swire Pacific Holdings, Inc. v. Zurich Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
- State v. BurrisSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Travelers Indem. Co. v. PCR INC.Supreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Amend v. McCabeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Severin Hegel v. The First Liberty Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015