Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Insurance v. River City Construction Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided October 4, 2001No. 3-00-0846PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE HOMER
delivered the opinion of the court:
Cincinnati Insurance Company (Cincinnati) filed a two-count complaint seeking contribution from River City Construction Company (River City) and Auto-Owners Insurance Company (Auto-Owners) for a work-related injury settlement paid by Cincinnati to Victor Modugno. Cincinnati appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the defendants’ separate motions to dismiss, filed pursuant to section 2 — 619 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2 — 619 (West 2000)). We affirm in part and reverse in part.
BACKGROUND
In November 1995,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Air Safety, Inc. v. Teachers Realty Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
- Glidden v. Farmers Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
- Dix Mutual Insurance v. LaFramboiseIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Epstein v. Chicago Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Western Illinois Oil Co. v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Home Insurance v. Cincinnati InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- West Bend Mutual Insurance Co v. Procaccio Painting & Drywall CCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Electric Insurance v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. Farm & City Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. Vigo Coal Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.