Legal Opinion

Harold Werkheiser v. Pocono Township

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 6, 2015No. 13-3646PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COWEN, Circuit Judge.

This matter requires us to decide whether elected officials are entitled to qualified immunity when they retaliate against a fellow official by denying him reappointment to a non-elected position because of comments he made in his capacity as an elected official. Because we conclude that the contours of the First Amendment right at issue were not clearly established, we hold that Appellants are entitled to qualified immunity on their federal claim. 1

I

In 2007, Harold Werkheiser was elected to serve on the three-member Board of Supervisors within Pocono Township. His…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Branti v. FinkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Williams v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  2. Mica Spady v. Bethlehem Area School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  3. Dyer v. Maryland State Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2016
  4. Roy Lee Williams v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
  5. Eves v. LePageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API