Hawkes Co. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
*870MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ANN D. MONTGOMERY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On July 9, 2013, the undersigned United States District Judge heard oral argument on Defendant United States Army Corps of Engineers’ (the “Corps”) Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 11]. Plaintiffs Hawkes Co., Inc. (“Hawkes”), Pierce Investment Co. (“Pierce”), and LPF Properties, LLC (“LPF”) filed this action seeking a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief to challenge a jurisdictional determination made by the Corps under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”). For the reasons stated herein, the Corps’ motion is granted.
II.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Sackett v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Rapanos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- U.S. Army Corps of Eng'rs v. Hawkes Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Belle Co. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Hawkes Co. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- U.S. Army Corps of Eng'rs v. Hawkes Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Hawkes Co. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015