Legal Opinion
Royal Thai Government v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 23, 2014No. Slip Op. 14-47; Court 13-00333PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge:
This matter is before the court on two motions to dismiss filed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the United States Court of International Trade by defendant United States and defendant-intervenor Coalition of Gulf Shrimp Industries (“COGSI”). Def.-Intervenor’s Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 26; Def.’s Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 28. COGSI and the United States move to dismiss the complaint filed by plaintiff Royal Thai Government because plaintiff lacks standing under Article III of the Constitution as there is no live “case or controversy.” For the reasons set forth below, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Freeport Minerals Company (Freeport-Mcmoran, Inc.) v. The United States, and Chevron Canada Resources Ltd. And Chevron Chemical Corp., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Rose Bearings Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Zhanjiang Guolian Aquatic Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Jubail Energy Services Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- PAO Severstal v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- Bldg. Sys. de Mexico, S.A. de C v. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- ArcelorMittal USA LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.