Legal Opinion

Frantz v. First National Bank of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1978No. 3325, 3328PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

This case arises under the commercial paper article of the Uniform Commercial Code as enacted in Alaska. 1 A section of that article provides that the drawer of a check which is dishonored is liable to its holder. 2 If the holder is not a holder in due course he takes the check subject to all defenses which the drawer has against any other party to the check. 3 A holder in due course, on the other hand, takes the check free from all but a very limited class of defenses. 4 In this case the court determined that the First National Bank of Anchorage was a holder in due…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Webb v. City and Borough of SitkaAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Braund, Inc. v. WhiteAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Cooper v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Bowling Green, Inc. v. State Street Bank and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  5. Eldon's Super Fresh Stores, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mitford v. De LasalaAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Sanitary & Improvement District No. 32 v. Continental Western Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Seinfeld v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Roberson v. ManningAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Register v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API