Legal Opinion

Brian Keith Balentine v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided February 20, 2013No. 09-09-00354-CRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINIÓN

DAVID GAULTNEY, Justice.

■ On original submission, this Court affirmed Brian Keith Balentine’s conviction for robbery. In addressing one of the issues, we held that the deletion of a phrase in the indictment at trial was permissible. See Balentine v. State, No. 09-09-00354-CR, 2011 WL 2732146 (Tex.App.-Beaumont July 13, 2011), rev’d by Balentine v. State, No. PD-1102-11, 2012 WL 4044895 (Tex.Crim.App. Sept. 12, 2012) (unpublished opinion). On petition for review from our decision, the Court of Criminal Appeals held that the phrase was not an alternate manner and means averment.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Gollihar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. State v. MoffCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  4. Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. Riney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jesus Christopher Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API