Legal Opinion

Schliske v. Albany Police Department

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided May 13, 2009No. Civ. 08-6098-AAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

AIKEN, Chief Judge:

Plaintiff, appearing pro se, filed suit against defendants alleging unlawful seizure under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law claims of false arrest and defamation/false light. Plaintiff and both defendants move for summary judgment on all claims. Upon review of the motions and supporting documentation, defendant Carlile’s motion is granted, defendant Albany Police Department’s motion is granted in part and denied in part, and plaintiffs motions are denied. Further, plaintiff is granted leave to amend his complaint with respect to his claim for unlawful seizure…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Philomene Long, Surviving Spouse and Heir-At-Law of John Thomas Idlet, Deceased v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Luiz v. Walt's TowingDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API