Legal Opinion

Brandt v. Olympic Construction, Inc.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 3, 1983PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action brought under G. L. c. 93A, § 9, for unfair and deceptive acts by the defendant (Olympic), a real estate developer, on a sale of a single-family house to the plaintiffs. A judge of the Superior Court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and entered an injunction permanently enjoining the defendant from developing a certain abutting parcel and awarded treble damages and attorney’s fees. On reasoning essentially similar to that of the trial judge, we reach the same result and affirm.

A summary of the relevant facts found by the judge follows. The plaintiffs began negotiations with…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Heller v. Silverbranch Construction Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Nei v. BurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Danca v. Taunton Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Baldassari v. Public Finance TrustMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Kannavos v. AnninoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Spring v. Geriatric Authority of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Bump v. RobbinsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  3. Cassano v. GogosMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  4. Urman v. South Boston Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Piccuirro v. GaitenbyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API