Legal Opinion

Ginsberg v. McIntire

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 6, 1998No. 52, Sept. Term, 1997PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

We granted certiorari on our own motion in this appeal, prior to its consideration by the Court of Special Appeals, primarily to consider the following, somewhat argumentatively phrased, issue:

“Did the trial court commit reversible error by permitting appellee to call a sitting Maryland state court judge as a witness on an irrelevant issue and to trumpet continually his judicial status before the jury, thereby allowing appellee to stamp her case with the imprimatur of a sitting judge?”

The appeal also raises sufficiency of the evidence issues, embellished by the parties’…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Merritt v. Reserve InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Helmbrecht v. St. Paul InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Joachim v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1966
  5. United States v. Betty FrankenthalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pickett v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Sansone v. Garvey, Schubert & BarerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. People v. DegorskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  4. People v. DegorskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  5. Marrs v. KellyKentucky Supreme Court · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API