Durham Hosiery Mill Ltd. Partnership v. Morris
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
In a summary ejectment action, the plaintiff’s burden of persuasion is by the preponderance of the evidence as set forth in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 42-30. The trial court erred in requiring the plaintiff to prove its case by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
Durham Hosiery Mill Limited Partnership (“DHM”) owns and operates the Durham Hosiery Mill Apartments (the “Apartments”), a section 8 housing community in Durham, North Carolina. Defendant Inez Morris leases and lives in Unit 251-D (the “Unit”) at the Apartments under the terms of a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Trustees of Rowan Technical College v. J. Hyatt Hammond Associates Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Wells v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Joyner v. GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Scarborough v. Dillard's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
- Charlotte Housing Authority v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Eastern Carolina Regional Housing Authority v. LoftonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
- Farrington v. WV Invs.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
- State v. HemingwayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
- State v. HemingwayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.