Legal Opinion
Farrell Lines, Inc. v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 9, 1970PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNathaniel T. Helman, J.
The action of the City of New York on the law side of the court has been consolidated with the action of Farrell Lines against the city on the equity side of the court. The complaint in the action of the city consists of three causes of action, (1) for an increase in rent resulting from defendant’s holding over by remaining in possession after the expiration of its lease, (2) charges for deferred maintenance and failure to repair, on the 35th Street pier, in the amount of $286,588, and (3) similar charges with respect to the 33rd Street pier in the amount of $222,349. The equity action is for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Appleton v. . MarxNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Dodge Street Building Corporation, a Nebraska Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Lehmaier v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Levine v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Farrell Lines, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Joyous Holdings, Inc. v. Volkswagen of Oneonta, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- 402 Nostrand Avenue Corp. v. SmithAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2008
- Comorford v. Jones, New York County Courts1983
- Palagonia v. PappasSuffolk County District Court · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.