Legal Opinion

Isett v. Stuart

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1875PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Bock Island county; the Hon. George W. Pleasants, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Soholfield

John M. Stuart, assignee in bankruptcy of Thomas M. Isett, exhibited his bill in chancery against Thomas M. Isett and Edward B. Isett, to set aside a mortgage, from the former to the latter, alleged to have been made in fraud of the Bankrupt Act.

Notice was given to the defendants in the bill by publication, and decree rendered by default in favor of the complainant; but appellant was subsequently, on his petition, permitted to appear and defend, whereupon he filed an answer, putting in issue the material allegations of the bill, denying that the mortgage was made in fraud of the Bankrupt Act;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cook v. . WhippleNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Stevens v. Mechanics' Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. Brigham v. ClaflinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Voorhies v. FrisbieMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Cogdell, Assignee v. . ExumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Phillips v. State ex rel. DornerSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  2. Whyte v. Betts Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
  3. Glover v. LoveSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API