Whyte v. Betts Machine Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
2nd. That while this Court reversed the order appealed from, yet inasmuch as the debtor had appeared to the proceedings after the order of adjudication was passed, the case should be remanded in order that he might have an opportunity to show cause against the-adjudication prayed for, and to have the benefit of trial as provided by the statute. Appeals from the Circuit Court for Baltimore County.
Read the full summary
2nd. That while this Court reversed the order appealed from, yet inasmuch as the debtor had appeared to the proceedings after the order of adjudication was passed, the case should be remanded in order that he might have an opportunity to show cause against the-adjudication prayed for, and to have the benefit of trial as provided by the statute. Appeals from the Circuit Court for Baltimore County. The proceedings in this case were instituted by the following petition, filed on the 19th of May, 1883, addressed to the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, and authenticated in the manner stated in…
1Opinion of the CourtAlvey, C. J.
This is a proceeding instituted under section 24 of Article 48, of the Code, as enacted by the Act of 1880, ch. 112. It is a proceeding in involuntary insolvency instituted by the Betts Machine Company, alleged to be a corporation created by the laws of the State of Delaware, against Thomas H. Paul as an insolvent debtor.
The petition, in the terms of the statute, alleged that Paul had departed from the State, with intent to defraud his creditors; that he remained absent, and continued to remain absent, at the time of filing the petition, with the intent of defrauding his creditors; that he…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stuart v. Hines & EamesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Agnew v. Bank of GettysburgCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1828
- Isett v. StuartIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by3 opinions
- Riley v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
- D'Arcy v. Locust Point Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
- Pfaff v. PragCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894