Riverside Cnty. Dep't of Pub. Soc. Servs. v. D.H. (In re D.H.)
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Dissent
RAMIREZ, P.J., Concurring and Dissenting
Today my colleagues hold that the juvenile court erred by terminating parental rights of D.H., Sr., a noncustodial father, because no unfitness or detriment finding had been made as to him prior to severing the familial relationship. I agree that the juvenile court erred, but I dissent from the majority's assumption that no finding of detriment had ever been made and that father's noncustodial status had not been interrupted by a removal of custody, when the record is incomplete. In my view, remand should be ordered to direct the juvenile court to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Department of Social Services v. Ronald P.California Supreme Court · 1981
- Cynthia D. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Guardianship of Ann S.California Supreme Court · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.