Bronk v. Barckley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to section 1279 of .the Code'of Civil Procedure. The facts are stated in the dissenting opinion of Parker, P. J.
1Opinion of the Court
Putnam, J.:
The contract which the plaintiff seeks to enforce was executed under and in pursuance of the provisions of chapter 382, Laws of 1889 (amending title 2 of chapter 3 of part 4 of the Revised Statutes), which provided that “ the managers of the New York State Reformatory, at Elmira, and the managing authorities of any of the penitentiaries, or other penal institutions of this State, are hereby authorized to conduct the labor of the prisoners therein, respectively, *73under the puhlic-account system, or piece-price- system, in like manner and subject to like restrictions as labor is…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Stone v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Sinking-Fund CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Matter of Application of JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wright v. Glen Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Wilson v. United Traction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- F. H. Mills Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Banks v. HunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Banks v. HunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897