F. H. Mills Co. v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the claimant, The Fl H. Mills' Company, from so. much of' a judgment of- the Court of Claims'of the State of Mew Y ork, in part in favor of .the claimant and in part in favor of the defendant, entered in said court on the 15th day of April, 1901, as. dismisses the claim’of the said company.
Read the full summary
Appeal by the claimant, The Fl H. Mills' Company, from so. much of' a judgment of- the Court of Claims'of the State of Mew Y ork, in part in favor of .the claimant and in part in favor of the defendant, entered in said court on the 15th day of April, 1901, as. dismisses the claim’of the said company. On the 15th day of Match, 1893, an agreement was entered.into, bearing date the i;6t-h day of February, 1893, in form- “ between the People of the State of -Mew York-, répresentéd- by the Board of , Managers of the Mew York State Reformatory at Elmira, M, Y., first party, and Fred H. Mills…
1Opinion of the Court
Chester, J.:
'■ The respective claims made against the State will be. considered in the order in which they are mentioned in the foregoing statement of facts. .. . - '
First. The claimant appears to have'.abandoned on the trial its' claim to recover damages for withdrawing certain inmates from the employment of the claimant for military services upon Wednesday and Saturday afternoons,, as what little evidence there is, on this subject is- of the most general character and not sufficient to form any fair basis for t,he award of damages on account thereof, so that no consideration of that phase…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Flower v. . LanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Bronk v. BarckleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Horner v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. Home Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985