Hudson v. Mandabach
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dempsey
The complaint in this case was for a declaratory-judgment to construe a dissolution contract between former partners in an advertising agency. Judgment was for the plaintiff.
In his answer the defendant raised an affirmative defense which charged that the plaintiff had a suit pending in the Municipal Court of Chicago to recover on the same agreement. The plaintiff did not reply to this allegation. His failure to do so was an admission of its truth. Sections 32 and 40(2), ch. 110, Ill. Rev. Stat. 1957; Laegeler v. Bartlett, 10 Ill.2d 478.
The primary question before us is whether a complaint for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Laegeler v. BartlettIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. City of FreeportIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
3Cited by8 opinions
- William Aupperle & Sons, Inc. v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- In Re Estate of BajonskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Pipitone v. MandalaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
- Wolf v. SolemAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
- Eckells v. City Council of East St. LouisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.