Legal Opinion

Inlow v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 10, 1929No. 7441PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. This court will not pass upon the constitutionality of a statute, where the particular provision of the constitution alleged to have been offended by the statute is not clearly designated. Griggs v. State, 130 Ga. 16 (60 S. E. 103) ; City of Atlanta v. Standard Life Insurance Co., 149 Ga. 501 (2) (101 S. E. 122); Dobbs v. Bullard, 149 Ga. 553 (101 S. E. 122) ; Wadley v. McCommon, 154 Ga. 420 (114 S. E. 357) ; City of Macon v. Anderson, 155 Ga. 607 (4) (117 S. E. 753).

2. A ground of the motion for a new trial complained that the judge held that a designated act of the legislature was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Griggs v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. City of Macon v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  3. Lee v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  4. Dobbs v. BullardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  5. City of Atlanta v. Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Abel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Liner v. City of RossvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  3. Williams v. McIntosh CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  4. Herndon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  5. Mullis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API