City of Macon v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
It is insisted by counsel for the City of Macon that the writ of prohibition must be addressed to a court; and that the’ council of this city, in hearing and deciding charges preferred for the removal of a member of its board of water commissioners, do not constitute such a judicatory as will authorize the grant of the writ of prohibition to restrain this action, if a proper ease for issuing such writ is otherwise made. In this contention we can not concur. The writ of prohibition lies “to arrest illegal proceedings by any court officer, where no other…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- In Re RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Speed v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Arthur v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- City of Atlanta v. Blackman Health Resort Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Ex parte OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- City of Valdosta v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Jackson v. CalhounSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Beavers v. ArmisteadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Byrd v. McLucasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.