Legal Opinion
Kinninger v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided February 18, 1988No. 87CA0466PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUME, Judge.
Donald F. Kinninger (claimant) seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) which denied his claim for compensation for a heart attack. We affirm.
Claimant asserts that the Administrative Law Judge (ALT) erred in concluding that the events preceding his heart attack did not constitute unusual exertion. Claimant also contends the AU erred in exclusively relying on Dr. Mutz’s opinion in finding that these events did not cause his heart attack.
The Panel’s resolution of the causation issue is supported by substantial evidence and is in accord with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Metals Climax, Inc. v. CisnerosSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Gelco Courier v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF STATEColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- May D & F v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
- Krumback v. Dow Chemical Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983
- Halliburton Services v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Florence v. PepperSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Rook v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- Nye v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Rendon v. United AirlinesColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.