Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Mieka Energy Corp.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided May 4, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:15-CV-00300-ALMPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
AMOS L. MAZZANT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendants Robert William Myers, Jr. and Stephen Romo (Dkt. # 32). The Court, having considered the motion, finds it should be granted.
BACKGROUND
Between September 2010 and October 2011, Daro Blankenship (“Blankenship”), though his company, Mieka Energy Corporation (“Mieka”), and with assistance from Stephen Romo (“Romo”) and Robert Myers, Jr. (“Myers”), raised almost $4.4 million from approximately 60…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- EdgePoint Capital Hldgs, LLC v. Apothecare Pharmacy, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. BakerDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2024