Spinks v. United States Lines Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
BONSAL, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12 (f) to strike the fifth defense from defendant’s answer. Plaintiff alleges he was injured while employed as a crew member aboard defendant’s ship. He seeks damages for personal injuries for negligence under the Jones Act (46 U.S.C. § 688) and for unseaworthiness under the general maritime law. The fifth defense is as follows:
“NINETEENTH: That the plaintiff’s employment aboard the SS SOUTHSTAR was procured by fraud in that at or before the time of plaintiff’s hiring, plaintiff knew he was bodily and physically unfit and unable, then…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Gypsum Carrier, Inc. v. William D. HandelsmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Still v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad v. BorumSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Roy L. Compton v. Luckenbach Overseas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Roy L. Compton v. Luckenbach Overseas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970