Legal Opinion

State v. Hurst

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 16, 1997No. 91CR-0289ST; CA A89274PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, P. J.

Defendant appeals from her conviction for unlawful possession of a short-barreled rifle, ORS 166.272, and argues that the trial court erred in failing to grant a motion sua sponte for judgment of acquittal on the ground that there was no evidence that the rifle she possessed was not registered as required under federal law. State v. Vasquez-Rubio, 323 Or 275, 284, 917 P2d 494 (1996) (state required to prove as an element of the crime that rifle was not registered). Defendant concedes that no motion for judgment of acquittal was made on that ground, but asserts that there is no evidence in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. Vasquez-RubioOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. WrisleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. Van NguyenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API