Legal Opinion
Phillippe v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 16, 1984No. 1-983A287PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEAL, Presiding Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Defendant-appellant, Harold W. Phillippe (Phillippe) perfected his interlocutory appeal challenging his re-prosecution in the Knox Superior Court for child molesting under IND.CODE 35-42-4-8(c) on the grounds of double jeopardy.
We affirm.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
On July 11, 1980, Phillippe was charged by information with having "perform[ed] intercourse with D , a child who was then under the age of 12 years, with intent to arouse and satisfy the sexual desire" of himself. The charge was filed under IND. CODE 35-42-4-8(b) which provides that "a person…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ried v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Burton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Emmons v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Manns v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Tyson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.