United States v. Prevezon Holdings, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, United States District Judge:
Prevezon Holdings Ltd. and affiliated entities (“Prevezon”) move for summary judgment.1 For the following reasons, Pre-vezon’s motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
This civil forfeiture action arises from the laundering of proceeds derived from a $230 million fraud in Russia, a portion of which was used to purchase real estate in Manhattan. Beginning in 2007, a Russian criminal organization (the-“Organization”) orchestrated an elaborate hoax designed to defraud the Russian Treasury into issuing tax refunds totaling ■ $230 million (the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Laura Holtz v. Rockefeller & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Lorenzo CHAMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRM COPY CENTERS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Prevezon Holdings, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- United States v. HoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Arcapita Bank B.S.S.(c) v. Bahrain Islamic Bank (In re Arcapita Bank B.C.C.(C))United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- B & R Supermarket, Inc. v. Visa, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2024
- United States v. $12,698.38 in US currencyDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.