Legal Opinion

Morris v. Fee

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1970PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

This is an appeal from an order quashing substituted service of summons in an action for damages for personal injuries. The sole question is the propriety of the court’s order.

Plaintiff attempted substituted service upon the Department of Motor Vehicles as provided in OPS 15.190 (3). This statute provides for such service when service in conformance with OPS 15.080 cannot be made and the defendant, after due diligence, cannot be found within the state and that fact appears by affidavit to the satisfaction of the court or judge. The relevant part of plaintiff’s affidavit which was tendered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Pratt v. MainOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Von Poppenheim v. Portland Boxing & Wrestling CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ter Har v. BackusOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Ter Har v. BackusOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State Ex. Rel. Handly v. HieberOregon Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API