Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Pratt v. Main

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1969PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

This is a mandamus proceeding brought against a circuit judge to determine whether his refusal to quash service of summons on the Oregon Department of Motor Vehicles was error.

Patricia Rettman, the plaintiff, brought an action against the relator, Pratt, and his employer, Dodge Center, for personal injuries allegedly sustained in an automobile collision. The plaintiff sought to obtain jurisdiction over Pratt by proceeding in accordance with; ORS 15.190(3). ① ORS 15.190 provides in an action against a motorist that when' a court is satisfied that personal service cannot be made upon a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. KresslySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  2. STATE Ex Rel CARROLL v. REDDINGOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Rudikoff v. BYRNENew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  4. State Ex Rel. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. UpdegraffOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Laughlin v. HughesOregon Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kintigh v. ElliottOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Ter Har v. BackusOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State Ex. Rel. Handly v. HieberOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State Ex. Rel. Knapp v. SloperOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Matter of Marriage of McDanielCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API