Feeney v. Dell Computer Corp.
Massachusetts Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
Fremont-Smith, Thayer, J.
In this case, the Su-
preme Judicial Court has reversed this Court’s confirmation of an arbitrator’s award (which found in favor of the defendants) on the ground that the arbitration agreement itself was void because it violated public policy so that arbitration should not have been compelled in the first place.1 The Supreme Judicial Court ruled that the arbitration clause in Dell’s standard terms and conditions document “is contrary to the fundamental public policy of the Commonwealth favoring consumer class actions under G.L.c. 93A.” Feeney v. Dell, Inc., 454 Mass.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Castellucci v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Lantner v. CarsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Poznik v. Massachusetts Medical Professional Ins. Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Mathis v. Massachusetts Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Feeney v. Dell, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2011