Legal Opinion

Feeney v. Dell, Inc.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided October 4, 2011No. MICV200301158Published

1Opinion of the Court

Wilkins, Douglas H., J.

The defendants, Dell, Inc. and certain affiliates (collectively, “Dell”), argue that this Court must disregard the Supreme Judicial Court’s rescript invalidating Dell’s arbitration agreement in this very case, Feeney v. Dell, Inc., 454 Mass. 192 (2009), because of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S.Ct. 1740 (2011). In the plaintiffs’ view, that would amount to disobedience.

These arguments arise in a putative consumer class action brought by the late John A. Feeney3 and Ded-ham Health and Athletic Club challenging Dell’s…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API