United States v. Carlous Lindell Daily
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
Carious Daily appeals from the sentence that the district court1 imposed after granting him relief from his previous sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The government cross-appeals, asserting that relief was time-barred and that the district court had no statutory power to resentence Mr. Daily. We affirm.
I
A jury convicted Mr. Daily of conspiring to commit bank robbery, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, committing armed bank robbery, see 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (d), and using a firearm during a crime of violence, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(1). The court then determined that Mr. Daily’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. WhitingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Francisco GranadosCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. WohlmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Carlous Lindell Daily, Also Known as "Los,"Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Daniel WirsingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Gregory Scott Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- James Joseph Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Gregory Scott Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Gregory Scott Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.