Legal Opinion

State v. Goodrum

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 26, 1983No. 82-094PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The factual setting of this case presents us with the legal question of when a bump, shove, or push becomes force sufficient to constitute robbery, as opposed to the lesser-included offense of theft. We affirm the defendant’s conviction of robbery.

Thirteen-year-old Mark Crueger was on his paper route in Nashua. In order to check his customer list, Mark placed his money bag on top of his bag of papers. At this time, he saw two men walking along the sidewalk. One of the men was the defendant, Horace *78M. Goodrum, III. Mark then looked down “and suddenly realized I was being knocked off” the curb…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. PattonIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. ShermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. People v. ShermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. State v. DumontSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  5. State v. StoneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. FordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  2. Boulanger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  3. Gerard Boulanger v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API