Legal Opinion

Aves ex rel. Aves v. Shah

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 18, 1996No. 88-1669-PFKPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PATRICK F. KELLY, Senior District Judge.

The action currently before the court is a garnishment action against the Commissioner of Insurance of the State of Kansas, in his role as Administrator of the Kansas Health Care Stabilization Fund. Underlying the garnishment action is the judgment returned in a medical malpractice action brought against Dr. Nasreen B. Shah and the Central Kansas Medical Center. In 1990, the jury in the malpractice action returned a verdict for the plaintiffs, Darcy Aves and her parents, in excess of $23 million, finding Dr. Shah 90% at fault and the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. AVES BY AND THROUGH AVES v. ShahDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API