Legal Opinion

AVES BY AND THROUGH AVES v. Shah

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 18, 1996No. 88-1669-PFKPublished

1Opinion of the Court

914 F.Supp. 443 (1996)

Darcy M. AVES, a Minor, By and Through Dan J. AVES and Faye E. Aves, Her Mother and Father, Natural Guardians and Next Friends; Darcy M. Aves, Individually; and Dan J. Aves and Faye E. Aves, Individually, Plaintiffs,

v.

Nasreen B. SHAH, M.D., Defendant,

v.

Ron TODD, Commissioner of Insurance of the State of Kansas, as Administrator of the Health Care Stabilization Fund, Garnishee.

No. 88-1669-PFK.

United States District Court, D. Kansas.

January 18, 1996.

Mark B. Hutton, Derek S. Casey and Channel P. Townsley, of Hutton & Hutton, Wichita, KS, Randall E. Fisher, Law Offices of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API