Legal Opinion

Prest-O-Lite Co. v. Ray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 17, 1914PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Frederick Ray and others, etc., from an order and determination of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 24th day of June, 1913, affirming a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of New York in plaintiff’s favor.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

The recovery was for the penalty given by section 367 of the General Business Law, being chapter 20 of the Consolidated Laws (Laws of 1909, chap. 25), as amended by chapter 475 of the Laws of 1909, which added said section thereto.

The plaintiff was duly incorporated under the laws of Indiana in September, 1904. It has been duly authorized to do business in this State and has a plant at Astoria, Queens county, N. Y., where it manufactures and prepares for sale and sells there and elsewhere acetylene gas in five sizes of copper-plated steel shells, containers, cylinders or tanks,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Ohio Oil Company v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co. v. Hall's Safe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Taendsticksfabriks Akticbolagat Vulcan v. MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coca-Cola Co. v. StevensonDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1920
  2. Prest-O-Lite Co. v. BricknerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API