Legal Opinion

Young v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 7, 1920No. 5766PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Judge.

By motion the Assistant Attorney General suggests that this court has not acquired jurisdiction to decide this case on its merits, for the reason that a recognizance in substantial compliance with the statute is wanting. On appeal to this court the statute, Article 903, Code of Criminal Procedure, requires that the recognizance in a case of misdemeanor shall state the punishment; at least, it has been construed in a uniform line of decisions to be incomplete if it fails to state the punishment. Watson v. State, 62 Texas Crim. Rep., 620; White v. State 68 Texas Crim. Rep., 147;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Goss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Hayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Perry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API