Legal Opinion
State v. Stahl
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 7, 2016No. Case 2D14-4283PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACK, Judge.
The State seeks a writ of certiorari quashing the trial court’s order denying the State’s motion to compel the production of the passcode to unlock Aaron Stahl’s cellphone. We grant the petition and quash the order.
I. Background
Stahl was charged with video voyeurism in violation of section 810.145(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2014), a third-degree felony. The probable cause affidavit for Stahl’s arrest stated that the victim was shopping in a store when she observed a man crouching down with what she believed was a cellphone in his hand. She saw that the screen of the cellphone was…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- G.A.Q.L., A MINOR v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- State v. AndrewsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- In re Search of [Redacted] Wash.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.