Legal Opinion
Cleveland v. Mascho
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 30, 1918No. 8796PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Error from District Court, Lincoln. County ; Chas. B. Wilson, Jr., Judge. Action by A, S. Cleveland and another, surviving partners of the firm of Wta. D. Cleveland & Son, against A. E. Mascho and another. Judgment for defendants, and ■plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
HOOKER, C.
On the 24th day of March, 1914, one Mascho informed the plaintiffs in error by mail that he had to sell or .ship 132 bales of good cotton, mostly white, in strictly M. M. M., and inquiring of it if it could sell it and the charges and differences in grades; to which on the 27th day of March, 1914, the plaintiffs in error replied, in substance, as follows;
"We have your postal of recent date to hand and thank you for it. * * * There is a goiyi demand in fhi; mari.et for the better grades and a fair demand for all grades. * * * Our commission charge is $1 per bale and - this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Oelricks v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- A. L. Jones & Co. v. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Chicago, R. I. P. Ry. Co. v. Dodson & WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cities Service Gas Co. v. EggersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Smith v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Cleveland v. MaschoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- First Nat. Bank of Chandler v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- El Reno Mill & Elevator Co. v. Medlock Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.