Legal Opinion

El Reno Mill & Elevator Co. v. Medlock Grocery Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 11, 1924No. 12753PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

Parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court. Plaintiff sued defendant, a copartnership, naming the partners, to-recover $1,725 as damages for breach of contract for purchase of 150,000 pounds of flour. Plaintiff wrote defendant :

“The El Reno Mill and Elevator Co.
“El Reno, Oklahoma, Contract No. 511.
“El Reno, July 24, 1917.
“Medlock Grocery Company.
“Grandfield, Okla.
“Dear Sirs:—
“We confirm sale to you by phone, Mr. Huff this date as follows: 6 cars, 25,000 pounds each Humreno flour, prices per bbl. or ewt. 13.20, Basis 48s, Ereight allowed to Grandfield,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oelricks v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  2. Winemiller v. PageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Cherokee Grain Co. v. Elk City Flour Mills Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. A. L. Jones & Co. v. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Cleveland v. MaschoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sooner Broadcasting Company v. GrotkopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API