Legal Opinion
Walters v. The Enrichment Ctr. of Wishing Well, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 1997No. 1996-1429PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 78 Ohio St.3d 118.] WALTERS ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THE ENRICHMENT CENTER OF WISHING WELL, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Walters v. The Enrichment Ctr. of Wishing Well, Inc.,
1997-Ohio-232.] Civil procedure—Denial of an asserted statutory privilege of confidentiality is not a special proceeding for purposes of R.C. 2505.02, but is an interlocutory discovery order and is neither final nor appealable. The denial of an asserted statutory privilege of confidentiality is not a special proceeding for purposes of R.C. 2505.02, but is an…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Bell v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Polikoff v. AdamOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Whitelock v. Gilbane Building Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MuncieOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Stevens v. AckmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Lamar Advantage GP Co., L.L.C. v. CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State ex rel. Thompson v. SponOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Crockett v. Crockett, Unpublished Decision (2-6-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.